Review Round-Up: 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald'
In a matter of days, Harry Potter fanatics will get the chance to revisit the Wizarding World at [...]
Variety
"Unfortunately, even the most meticulous world-building is only half the journey; you still have to populate that world with real characters and compelling stories, and it's that second half of the equation that comes up missing in "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald." The noisiest, most rhythmless, and least coherent entry in the Wizarding World saga since Alfonso Cuarón first gave the franchise its sea legs in 2004, "Grindelwald" feels less like "The Hobbit" than a trawl through the appendixes of "The Silmarillion" — a confusing jumble of new characters and eye-crossing marginalia. Most of the surface pleasures of filmic Potterdom (the chiaroscuro tones, the overqualified character actors, the superb costuming, James Newton Howard's warmly enveloping score) have survived intact, but real magic is in short supply." - Variety
prevnextIndieWire
"Even magic takes a little bit of planning, and in David Yates' "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald," both are in short supply. In it second outing, the cracks are starting to show in J.K. Rowling's much-hyped followup series to "Harry Potter," a franchise that is at the mercy of slapdash planning (these films are cobbled together from various pieces of "Wizarding World" material, not single novels) and the kind of higher-up decree that promised five films (five!) before the first one hit theaters. It's a lot of time to fill, and while the second film in the franchise nudges its narrative forward, it's at the expense of a bloated, unfocused screenplay." - IndieWire
prevnextIGN
"Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is another strong entry in J.K. Rowling's Wizarding World saga. Rowling has improved upon the first Fantastic Beasts film by fleshing out her characters in a way that's engaging, though not everybody receives as much attention. Both Johnny Depp and Eddie Redmayne are - forgive the pun - fantastic in their respective roles." - IGN
prevnextDen of Geek
"There's a menagerie of new beasts in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald and a fair few of them could legitimately be called 'fantastic'. There's also an enormous roll call of characters, and here's where the fantasticness abates somewhat, but more on that later. The latest instalment of JK Rowling's 5-part Harry Potter prequel is a magical adventure, an immersive dip back into the Wizarding World, packed with wonder and delight, which should elicit warm memories and Christmassy feels. Like a visit to Warner Bros 'Making of Harry Potter' Studio Tour, the set pieces, the stunning visuals, the world building and the sheer attention to detail will blow your socks off. But like the WB tour, there's too many people and you don't go there for the plot." - Den of Geek
prevnextThe Hollywood Reporter
"Eddie Redmayne's shy, diffident character Newt Scamander — the Magizoologist with a menagerie of comically odd creatures in his suitcase — is no Harry Potter, at least not yet. But Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, the second in the projected five-movie franchise written by J.K. Rowling, displays enough of the author's magical formula and Dickensian narrative power to make this sequel a huge step up from the middling Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016). The sequel has better and at times galvanizing special effects, a darker tone and a high-stakes battle between good and evil. Best of all, its characters are more vibrantly drawn, and tangled in relationships that range from delightful to lethal.
Crimes of Grindelwald also has some serious liabilities, the gravest being a misbegotten performance by Johnny Depp as the villain of the title. But unlike the first installment, which felt like a strained effort to extend Rowling's brand, this engaging film has a busy, kinetic style of its own." - The Hollywood Reporter
prevnextTelegraph UK
"The biggest riddle in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is working out what on earth the film is actually about.
Describing what happens in this second of five planned instalments in JK Rowling's Harry Potter spin-off franchise is a little easier: eccentric monster buff Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) and the proto-fascist wizard leader Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) descending on Roaring Twenties Paris, along with other interested parties, in search of Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller), a teenage orphan afflicted by a dark,..." - Telegraph UK
prevnextThe Guardian
"Fewer beasts; more crimes. This second adventure in JK Rowling's movie series about unworldly young magi-zoologist Newt Scamander, engagingly played by Eddie Redmayne, takes the inevitable darker and more sombre turn. The storyline is initially clotted with sneaky narrative about-turns, reactivating characters from the last film, rescuing them from apparent destruction or memory loss; there are unresolved mysteries and a general sense of disquieting forces and intricate implications that may take many films to sort out." - The Guardian
prevnextUSA Today
"The "Potter" saga is a rich, sprawling and beloved tale, and the inspired "Beasts" films are seemingly committed to filling in important nooks and crannies: Hufflepuffs and Slytherins alike will enjoy seeing Dumbledore as an emotionally troubled teacher decades before becoming Harry's eccentric mentor.
"Crimes" is missing some of the goofy appeal of the original "Beasts," where stopping lovable creatures from making a mess of the Big Apple comprised much of the conflict. But the world keeps turning and the threats get bigger for heroic wand-wavers, even the resident magizoologist." - USA Today
prevnextGizmodo
"There's a moment near the end of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald when I realized the scene I was watching could have been the second one in the movie. Instead, it was near the end, climactic and important. Yet it took so long to get here and everything that happened prior was so superfluous to the events unfolding, it dawned on me that the latest film in J.K. Rowling's Wizarding World simply wasn't up to par.
Directed by David Yates and written by Rowling, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is the second film in a proposed five-film series that began in 2016 with Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. That first movie had a lot of heavy lifting to do, introducing a whole new section of Rowling's franchise complete with characters, mythologies, creatures, and more. It had so much to do, in fact, as long as it was entertaining, you could almost forgive it if it ultimately wasn't about much." - Gizmodo
prevnextPolygon
"As it turns out, the true crime of Grindelwald was wasting the audience's time.
That shallowness is echoed by the film's attempted political allegories. After a laughably short imprisonment, wizard-Hitler Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) is back on the loose, and once again shoring up support for his crusade to rid the world of non-magical peoples (aka "no-majs" aka "can't-spells"). Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), who hems and haws about joining the fray, is told by his brother Theseus (Callum Turner) that he must "choose a side." As true as it is that inaction is, in and of itself, a form of action, any attempted depth by Rowling (who wrote the screenplay) is scuttled by late-game twists that seem to ask the audience to empathize with the wizarding equivalent of Nazi sympathizers and collaborators." - Polygon
prev