5 Unfairly Criticized Games of the 2010s

Gamers know how fast opinions form in this industry. A trailer drops, a few reviews hit, a streamer makes a joke, and suddenly a game’s entire reputation is set in stone. Games cost real money, and players do not want to waste time on something that feels undercooked or just not for them. It makes sense. When a game has to compete for attention with every other release in existence, players tend to stick with whatever looks safe or guarantees fun right away.

But that quick judgment can bury some genuinely great games. Over the last decade, quite a few titles were tossed aside before they had a chance to prove themselves. Some were misunderstood at launch, some were compared to the wrong games, and some simply landed in the wrong moment. Yet all of them were far better than the criticism suggested. This list highlights five games that deserved a longer look from the community and have since earned a second life from players willing to revisit them.

5. Prey (2017)

Prey was released into a strange cloud of confusion. Many players did not know what it was supposed to be. Some expected a sequel to the original Prey from 2006, while others thought it would lean more into being a spiritual successor to BioShock. Both fair and reasonable guesses. When the game turned out to be a slower, methodical, and immersive experience that expected players to think before acting, it immediately created a divide. Early criticism focused on pacing and the fact that it did not match the blockbuster expectations people brought to it. Not really fair to it.

Looking back now, Prey has aged into something far greater than its first impression. Its significant focus on moment-to-moment worldbuilding, an eerie atmosphere, and clever level design all contributed to an experience that rewards exploration and experimentation: aspects you would not expect to be focal in a first-person shooter to this day. Talos I (the space station and setting in which the game takes place) feels alive in a way few sci-fi settings manage. Players who revisit it often find themselves wondering why this game was ever dismissed at all, because unlike all the other games on this list, Prey was a smooth experience from day one. Once its systems click, it becomes one of the most engaging experiences of its generation, and it’s a shame it was put down before it could really stand up.

4. Mad Max (2015)

Mad Max launched with the bad luck of being overshadowed by the massive success of Mad Max: Fury Road, and many players expected the game to match the film’s non-stop energy. What they got instead was a slower, more methodical open world with a heavier focus on upgrading the Magnum Opus and exploring the wasteland at their own pace. Early reviews criticized the structure, the repetition, and the story not matching the wild creativity of the movie universe.

Years later, the game has built a strong cult following who appreciate exactly what it delivered. Its car combat is still some of the most satisfying in any open-world title (let alone unique in itself), and its brutal atmosphere perfectly captures the feeling of surviving in a broken world. Once you settle into the rhythm of clearing camps, upgrading gear, and cruising through the wasteland, the game becomes an oddly relaxing yet intense experience. Mad Max did not get the recognition it deserved, but it absolutely earned the praise it receives now.

3. Alpha Protocol (2010)

Alpha Protocol is older than the last decade by a few years, but its reputation carried well into it, and the reevaluation it received fits perfectly into this conversation. At launch, it struggled with janky combat, inconsistent performance, and plenty of bugs. Critics were not gentle, and many players wrote it off instantly, too. For good reason. For most people, it looked like an RPG that tried to do too much with too little polish. Not cooking long enough before its grand release, is its greatest sin.

But under that rough exterior was one of the most reactive and ambitious choice-driven RPG systems of its era. Conversations had real consequences. Alliances shifted based on attitude as much as decisions. Entire missions and story arcs changed depending on how players behaved, not just what choices they selected. Very few RPGs today replicate the depth of its narrative branching. It is flawed and incredibly janky, no question, but the ambition behind it earned a loyal following from players who value story flexibility above perfect gunplay.

2. BioShock 2 (2010)

BioShock 2 suffered from being a sequel to one of the most beloved games of all time. No matter how good it was, a portion of the audience had already decided it could not match the original. Early criticism revolved around the idea that it did not have the same surprise factor, the same impact, or the same sense of mystery. And fair enough. The game was seen by many as much more of a room-to-room arcade shooter than the first, which is a very fair criticism to have. The game was seen as unnecessary, and many people dismissed it.

Over time, it has become clear that BioShock 2 was doing something very different. Instead of trying to outdo the original, it explored Rapture through a more action-oriented and intense perspective. The role of a Big Daddy gave players a unique bond with the world, and the relationship with Eleanor added a surprising amount of heart. Many fans now consider it the stronger title in terms of gameplay and moment-to-moment pacing. It may not have shocked the world like its predecessor, but it absolutely deserved better than the cold shoulder it received.

1. Spec Ops: The Line (2012)

Spec Ops: The Line was released into a market flooded with military shooters, and at a glance it looked like just another one. That surface-level familiarity was by far this title’s greatest fault. The idea worked against it, because many players dismissed it without realizing what the game was really doing. Critics often compared it to other shooters and judged it by the same standards, focusing on the fact that its gameplay felt simple or traditional.

Players who stuck with it discovered one of the most psychologically and emotionally heavy stories the genre has ever seen or attempted, something well beyond your typical SOCOM or Call of Duty. Instead of glorifying violence, it forced players to confront it morally. Instead of offering clean moral choices, it exposed the messy reality behind them. The game used familiar mechanics as a tool to lure players into something much more impactful. It was misunderstood at launch, but now it is widely considered a narrative classic that deserved far more attention (and a proper sequel).

---

What do you think? Leave a comment below and join the conversation now in the ComicBook Forum!