Anime

No, One Piece Didn’t Retcon A Major Story, And Here’s Why

Any long-running story will be subjected to retcons and continuity errors, and One Piece is no exception. Despite how often things are planned years in advance, between how certain characters act and how Haki and Devil Fruits are presented, itโ€™s clear that certain elements do change to fit the story’s needs, even if it ultimately causes continuity errors.

Videos by ComicBook.com

That being said, there are many times when something in One Piece will be labelled a retcon when, in reality, the explanation is fairly simple, and people only call it a retcon because they werenโ€™t paying attention. One Piece chapter #1167 is a particularly egregious example of that, and seeing it happen is nothing short of frustrating.

Why One Piece Fans Think The Story Was Retconned (& Why They Couldn’t Be More Wrong)

One Piece chapter #1167 expanded on Fisher Tiger breaking into Mary Geoise to free slaves, and it did so by revealing that Shanks, now a Devoted Blade of God, broke him out of his chains and directed him to the armory, and that made people believe that One Piece retconned Tigerโ€™s story so that he was simply always a slave.

That idea, however, couldnโ€™t be more wrong. The Fishman Island arc explicitly stated that Fisher Tiger returned to Fishman Island 16 years before the present and then returned to Mary Geoise a year later to free slaves, something supported by Hancockโ€™s age at the time and chapter #1167โ€™s timeline, so nothing about Tigerโ€™s story has been retconned in the slightest.

As for why Fisher Tiger was in chains in chapter #1167, considering how he attacked Mary Geoise all by himself, itโ€™s not unreasonable that Tiger was simply recaptured and needed to break out of slavery again. At the very least, itโ€™s more reasonable than his entire story being retconned, yet thatโ€™s what many fans believe, oddly enough.

One Piece’s Latest Controversy Reveals A Major Fandom Problem

The debate over whether Fisher Tigerโ€™s story was retconned is especially frustrating because itโ€™s nothing new for the One Piece fandom. Anytime something seems to contradict previously established lore, fans will almost immediately jump to it being a retcon; things like Rocksโ€™ character and the true nature of the Gum-Gum Fruit were like that, and Tigerโ€™s backstory is no different.

The problem there ends up being two-fold; not only do fans not trust the idea that things donโ€™t have to be taken at face value, but they also lose track of the smallest details when focusing on lore and power scaling, all of which is an extremely shallow way of looking at One Piece

The very first page of Fisher Tigerโ€™s arc solves the timeline issue, and so many people willingly ignoring it shows how selective fans are with what they engage with. One Pieceโ€™s massive length does make it hard to keep track of certain things, but the entire situation with Fisher Tiger shows that, unfortunately, the fans donโ€™t make it any easier.